Manufatura Digital de Próteses Auriculares: Uma Revisão de Escopo

Bárbara Olivetti Artioli; Maycon Crispim de Oliveira Carvalho; Maria Elizete Kunkel

doi:10.36489/saudecoletiva.2025v16i101p17598-17617

Authors

Bárbara Olivetti Artioli Mestre em Engenharia Biomédica - Universidade Federal do ABC. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0859-3563
Maycon Crispim de Oliveira Carvalho Mestre em Engenharia Biomédica - Universidade Anhembi Morumbi. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9282-2068
Maria Elizete Kunkel Professora Dra. adjunta Universidade Federal de São Paulo Unifesp. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1711-9289

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36489/saudecoletiva.2025v16i101p17598-17617

Keywords:

Ear Prosthesis, Additive Manufacturing, Digital Technologies, Rehabilitation

Abstract

This article presents a review of the scope of methodologies, technologies and results associated with the use of digital manufacturing in the production of ear prostheses, highlighting its transformative impact on auditory rehabilitation, as well as the current challenges and perspectives for the development and dissemination of this technology. For this, a scope review with 44 articles was conducted. The results demonstrated the transition to digital workflows, with the direct method being employed in 55% of the studies. This approach allowed the creation of more precise, efficient and low-cost prostheses, resulting in greater patient satisfaction. The transition to digital ear prosthesis production is a promising breakthrough that has the potential to overcome the challenges of conventional manufacturing. The evolution of scanning and 3D printing, development of open source software and the use of new materials will make processes more accessible and efficient.

References

hobkhun P, et al. An anthropometric study of the external ear in the Thai population. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75(4):1417-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.065

Tang L, et al. The ideal proportion of the auricle exposure via a morphometric analysis in Asian women. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2024;48:2611-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03989-0

Lei L, et al. A survey of aesthetic standards of the ear. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31(2):527-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006203

Lee W, et al. Anthropometric analysis of 3D ear scans of Koreans and Caucasians for ear product design. Ergonomics. 2018;61(11):1480-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1493150

Sundar PS, Chowdhury C, Kamarthi S. Evaluation of human ear anatomy and functionality by axiomatic design. Biomimetics. 2021;6(2):31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics6020031

Ladani P. Ear reconstruction. In: Bonanthaya K, et al., editors. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for the Clinician. Singapore: Springer; 2021. p. 731-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1346-6_35

Klassen AF, et al. An international study to develop the EAR-Q patient-reported outcome measure for children and young adults with EAR conditions. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74(9):2341-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.01.014

Joukhadar N, et al. Management of congenital auricular anomalies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146(2):205e-16e. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006997

Sakae E, Aki F. Estudos das complicações na reconstrução de orelha [dissertação]. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo; 2007.

Giot JP, Labbe D, Soubeyrand E, Pacini R, Guillou-Jamard MR, Compere JF, et al. Prosthetic reconstruction of the auricle: indications, techniques, and results. Semin Plast Surg. 2011;25(4):265-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1288918

Mevio E, et al. Bone-anchored titanium implants in patients with auricular defects: three years and 27 patients’ experience. Int J Otolaryngol. 2016;2016:9872048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9872048

Bhatti SL, et al. Ear abnormalities. Pediatr Rev. 2021;42(4):180-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2019-0167

Viswanathan AK, Chidambaranathan AS. Effective rehabilitation of auricular defects with two different prosthetic materials: case reports. Tanta Dent J. 2024;21(1):105-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/tdj.tdj_9_21

Tanveer W, et al. Applications of CAD/CAM technology for craniofacial implants placement and manufacturing of auricular prostheses—systematic review. J Clin Med. 2023;12(18):5950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12185950

Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Porritt K, Pilla B, Jordan Z. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI; 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-24-01

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

Chee Kai C, et al. Facial prosthetic model fabrication using rapid prototyping tools. Integr Manuf Syst. 2000;11(1):42-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09576060010303668

Gebhardt A. Rapid prototyping based design and manufacturing of facial prostheses. Phidias Report. 2000;4:4-8.

Sykes LM, et al. Applications of rapid prototyping technology in maxillofacial prosthetics. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(4).

Jiao T, et al. Design and fabrication of auricular prostheses by CAD/CAM system. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(4).

Ciocca L, Scotti R. CAD-CAM generated ear cast by means of a laser scanner and rapid prototyping machine. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92(6):591-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.08.021

Chandra A, et al. Application of rapid manufacturing techniques in support of maxillofacial treatment: evidence of the requirements of clinical applications. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf. 2005;219(6):469-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1243/095440505X32300

Mardini M, Ercoli C, Graser GN. A technique to produce a mirror-image wax pattern of an ear using rapid prototyping technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(2):195-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.019

Bibb R, et al. An investigation of three-dimensional scanning of human body surfaces and its use in the design and manufacture of prostheses. Proc Inst Mech Eng H J Eng Med. 2006;214(6):589-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1243/0954411001535615

Subburaj K, et al. Rapid development of auricular prosthesis using CAD and rapid prototyping technologies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36(10):938-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.07.013

Karayazgan-Saracoglu B, Gunay Y, Atay A. Fabrication of an auricular prosthesis using computed tomography and rapid prototyping technique. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(4):1169-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181acdb95

Turgut G, et al. Use of rapid prototyping in prosthetic auricular restoration. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(2):321-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181992266

Karatas MO, et al. Manufacturing implant supported auricular prostheses by rapid prototyping techniques. Eur J Dent. 2011;5(4):472-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1698921

Liacouras P, et al. Designing and manufacturing an auricular prosthesis using computed tomography, 3-dimensional photographic imaging, and additive manufacturing: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;105(2):78-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60002-4

De Crescenzio F, et al. Design and manufacturing of ear prosthesis by means of rapid prototyping technology. Proc Inst Mech Eng H J Eng Med. 2011;225(3):296-302.

Bai S, et al. Development and application of a rapid rehabilitation system for reconstruction of maxillofacial soft-tissue defects related to war and traumatic injuries. Mil Med Res. 2014;1(1):11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2054-9369-1-11

He Y, Xue G, Fu J. Fabrication of low cost soft tissue prostheses with the desktop 3D printer. Sci Rep. 2014;4:6973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06973

Watson J, Hatamleh MM. Complete integration of technology for improved reproduction of auricular prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(5):430-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.018

Artioli BO, Maluf NN, Roxo VGL. Produção de um protótipo de prótese de pavilhão auricular [monografia]. São Paulo: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo; 2014.

Nuseir A, et al. Improved construction of auricular prosthesis by digital technologies. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(6):e502-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002012

Moretto E, et al. Elaboração de próteses auriculares individualizadas por meio de manufatura auxiliada por computador. In: Brazilian Symposium on Computing Applied to Health (SBCAS); 2016; Porto Alegre. Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação; 2016. p. 2461-70. doi:10.5753/sbcas.2016.9892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbcas.2016.9892

Mohammed MI, et al. Advanced auricular prosthesis development by 3D modeling and multi-material printing. KnE Eng. 2017:37-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/keg.v2i2.593

Yadav S, et al. CAD/CAM-assisted auricular prosthesis fabrication for a quick, precise, and more retentive outcome: a clinical report. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(7):616-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12589

Jamayet NB, et al. A fast and improved method of rapid prototyping for ear prosthesis using portable 3D laser scanner. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71(6):946-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2018.02.003

Mohammed MI, et al. Augmented patient-specific facial prosthesis production using medical imaging modeling and 3D printing technologies for improved patient outcomes. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2018;13(3):164-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2018.1446122

Sarkar MA, Chahar P, Gowda EM, Prakash P. Rehabilitation of a patient of traumatic anotia using computer aided designing and rapid prototyping. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2019;6(1):A18-A21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21276/ijcmr.2019.6.1.35

Unkovskiy A, et al. Additive manufacturing: a comparative analysis of dimensional accuracy and skin texture reproduction of auricular prostheses replicas. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):e460-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12681

Unsal GS, Turkyilmaz I. Improved reconstruction of an implant-retained auricular prosthesis using CAD/CAM technology. J Dent Sci. 2019;14(3):328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2019.02.002

Cevik P, Kocacikli M. Three-dimensional printing technologies in the fabrication of maxillofacial prosthesis: a case report. Int J Artif Organs. 2020;43(5):343-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0391398819887401

Cruz RL, et al. Advancements in soft-tissue prosthetics part A: the art of imitating life. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00121

Manju V, et al. Rapid prototyping technology for silicone auricular prosthesis fabrication: a pilot study. J Head Neck Physicians Surg. 2021;9(1):35-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jhnps.jhnps_22_21

Bi Y, Zhou M, Wei H. Digital workflow for auricular prosthesis fabrication with a negative mold. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;131(6):1254-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.022

Singh K, Bhandari SK. Rehabilitation of a patient with anotia with implant-retained silicone auricular prosthesis using custom fabricated abutments and bar: a case report. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2022;12(1):42-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1350

Netshilindi N, Asia-Michaels W, Maart R. An innovative digital workflow for the fabrication of a prosthetic ear: a case report. S Afr Dent J. 2023;78(2):92-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/sadj.v78i02.16165

Sharma S, et al. Reverse engineering and CAD/CAM application in the design of maxillofacial prosthesis. Int J Interact Des Manuf (IJIDeM). 2025;19(2):1179-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-023-01503-5

Hatamleh MM, Hatamlah HM, Nuseir A. Use of 3-dimensional imaging and manufacturing for bilateral auricular prostheses: A case series of six patients with congenital auricular defects. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;132(5):1076-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.022

Kasahara T, et al. Accuracy of the Conventional Facial Impression Method and Three-Dimensional Auricular Shape Data Obtained Using Extra-and Intraoral Optical Scanners. Dent J. 2024;12(11):354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12110354

Kim M, et al. One-year results of ear reconstruction with 3D printed implants. Yonsei Med J. 2024;65(8):456-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2023.0444

Capotorto E, et al. Toward improved auricle reconstruction: The role of FDM 3D printing with PCL and TPU materials. Biomater Adv. 2025;169:214175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214175

İnal CB, Ayten UC, Nemli SK. Replacement implant-retained ear prosthesis using a semidigital workflow: A case report. Int J Prosthodont. 2025;38(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9021

İnal CB, Bankoğlu GM, Karakoca NS. Using a smartphone three-dimensional scanning application (Polycam) to three-dimensionally print an ear cast: a technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;133(3):926-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.04.026

Kaul RD, et al. A comparison of the accuracy and feasibility of a low-cost mobile application versus higher-cost handheld 3D scanner for digital ear prosthetics. ANZ J Surg. 2025;95(4):719-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.19374

Gadallah MA, Khamis MM, Abdelhamid AM, Ezzelarab S. Evaluation of the use of different intraoral scanners for auricular prosthetic reconstruction. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;134(2):513-9. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.09.028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.09.028

Nightingale RC, Price GL, Pickering E, Powell SK, Woodruff MA. Comprehensive smartphone-based 3D scanning framework for capturing the external ear. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2025;108:26-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2025.06.011